As EU negotiators prepare for a critical round of talks in Uruguay on December 5-6, France is stepping up its efforts to block the long-awaited EU-Mercosur trade agreement, which aims to create one of the world’s largest free trade zones. While Germany and Spain lead a coalition of EU states in favor of the deal, France is attempting to rally Italy, Austria, Poland, and the Netherlands to form a blocking minority.

The EU-Mercosur agreement, which has been in negotiations for 25 years, seeks to open up trade between the European Union’s 27 member states and the four founding countries of the South American Mercosur bloc: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Bolivia, which joined Mercosur in 2024, will not take part in the current negotiations. The deal promises to cover 750 million people and one-fifth of the global economy.

While a political agreement was reached in 2019, the deal has faced growing opposition from some EU member states, particularly those with strong agricultural sectors. France, which has consistently opposed the agreement, argues that the trade deal could harm its agricultural industry, especially in the context of lower Mercosur agricultural standards. French trade minister Sophie Primas has pushed for the inclusion of the Paris Agreement as a binding clause in the deal to ensure that environmental standards are met.

A French diplomat told Euronews that concerns about the deal extend beyond France, with countries such as Poland and Italy also expressing reservations. Poland’s agriculture ministry has warned that the deal could threaten its agricultural sector, particularly poultry. Italy has voiced similar concerns, with Agriculture Minister Francesco Lollobrigida demanding that Mercosur farmers adhere to the same standards as their EU counterparts.

Ireland, a major beef exporter, and Belgian farmers have also raised alarms about potential competition under the deal, fearing that it could drive down prices in European markets. Despite these concerns, it remains unclear whether these countries will join France in opposing the agreement.

France is also seeking support from the Netherlands, which voted against the deal in 2020. Dutch trade minister Reinette Klaver reiterated the country’s opposition, citing concerns over the impact on agriculture. However, the Netherlands’ position could shift depending on future negotiations.

In contrast, Germany and Spain strongly endorse the agreement, viewing it as an opportunity to expand exports, particularly in industries such as automotive, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and agriculture. For Spain, high-value agricultural exports like olive oil and Serrano ham are key benefits of the deal.

As the December meeting in Uruguay approaches, the debate over the EU-Mercosur agreement intensifies. With France aiming to block the deal and Germany and Spain pushing for its approval, the outcome of these negotiations could shape Europe’s trade relations with South America for years to come.

Georgia’s Prime Minister, Irakli Kobakhidze, has firmly rejected calls for new elections, despite ongoing large-scale protests and a wave of public resignations from senior officials. Demonstrators have taken to the streets for a fourth consecutive night to express their anger at the ruling Georgian Dream party’s suspension of talks on joining the European Union.

Kobakhidze’s comments, made on Sunday, sought to downplay the cause of the unrest, stating that reports of the suspension were false. “We have not suspended anything, it’s a lie,” he asserted, despite his party’s previous claims that the EU had used membership talks as “blackmail” and that the issue would not be revisited until at least 2028.

The protests, which began in Tbilisi and spread to other cities like Batumi and Zugdidi, have been fueled by concerns that the Georgian government is veering away from its European integration path and towards greater influence from Russia. Georgia, which has a population of 3.7 million, has 20% of its territory under Russian military occupation in two breakaway regions. An overwhelming majority of Georgians support EU accession, and many view the government’s stance as a betrayal.

Protests continued on Sunday as smaller groups occupied intersections in Tbilisi. Salome, a 29-year-old protester, explained her presence, saying, “I’m here for my country’s future and the future of my three-year-old son. I don’t want him to spend his life at protests, and I don’t want a Russian government.”

The government’s stance has led to growing disillusionment among public officials. Georgia’s Ambassador to the U.S., David Zalkaliani, is the latest senior diplomat to resign, following a wave of departures from the diplomatic corps and civil service. Thousands of teachers and civil servants have also signed petitions condemning the government’s decision.

The protests have escalated amid allegations of police violence against journalists and demonstrators. Several reporters have been injured, with some requiring hospitalization after being beaten or pepper-sprayed. Human rights ombudsman Levan Ioseliani condemned the violence, describing it as “brutality” and calling on the police to exercise restraint.

The situation has led to increased tensions with Western allies. On Sunday, U.S. officials announced they were suspending their strategic partnership with Georgia, while the EU’s new foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, warned that the Georgian government’s actions would have “direct consequences.” The government’s relations with the EU and the U.S. have been severely damaged.

Georgia’s pro-Western President Salome Zourabichvili, who is set to step down at the end of the month, has rallied against the government, calling for new elections. However, Kobakhidze dismissed her calls, stating, “She has four Fridays left, and she can’t get used to it.”

As the political crisis deepens, Georgia’s path toward the EU and its future direction remain uncertain. The ongoing protests and resignations signal a growing discontent with the government’s policies and a potential turning point in the country’s political landscape.

Rebel forces launched their largest offensive against the Syrian government in years, capturing significant portions of Aleppo, Syria’s second-largest city, by Sunday and advancing towards Hama in the south.

The surprise attack, led by the Islamist militant group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), marked a significant escalation in the long-standing conflict. The offensive prompted the first Russian airstrikes on Aleppo since 2016, forcing the Syrian military to withdraw from the city.

HTS, an evolution of the Al Qaeda-linked group Jabhat al-Nusra, spearheaded the assault. Originally formed in 2011 with the involvement of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the group broke away from Al Qaeda in 2016 under the leadership of Abu Mohammed al-Jawlani. Now the dominant force in Syria’s northwestern Idlib province, HTS has long been regarded as one of the most effective yet controversial groups opposing President Bashar al-Assad.

Idlib: A Rebel Stronghold

Since the height of the Syrian conflict, Idlib has remained a rebel stronghold, housing approximately four million people, many displaced from other parts of the country. HTS governs much of the region, although its rule has been criticized for alleged human rights abuses and infighting with rival factions.

A 2020 ceasefire brokered by Russia, Assad’s ally, and Turkey, which supports rebel groups, had largely kept Idlib quiet until now. However, recent Israeli offensives targeting Iranian-linked militias, including Hezbollah, have weakened Assad’s support network, leaving his forces vulnerable to renewed attacks.

Strategic Shifts and Regional Impacts

Aleppo, a city symbolic of rebel resistance and government victories, was one of the bloodiest battlegrounds of the war. Assad’s military, already stretched thin and reliant on Russian airpower and Iranian-backed militias, has faced renewed pressure as Israel intensifies strikes on Iran-aligned groups operating in Syria.

These developments appear to have emboldened HTS to expand its ambitions beyond Idlib, reigniting conflict in areas previously under government control. The group’s sudden offensive highlights shifting dynamics within Syria’s fragmented war and raises questions about the sustainability of Assad’s grip on power.

Renewed Uncertainty

For the past four years, Assad’s rule has gone largely uncontested in major cities, with Kurdish-majority areas in the east and militant-controlled Idlib remaining exceptions. However, the latest developments suggest a potential escalation in a conflict many believed was winding down.

The outcome of this offensive could reshape Syria’s political and military landscape, as HTS seeks to challenge Assad’s dominance while leveraging its position as a de facto authority in Idlib. The question now is whether Syria’s fractured alliances and external pressures will lead to renewed conflict on a broader scale.