Google Opposes DOJ’s Proposal to Sell Chrome, Warns of Harm to Consumers
Google has strongly opposed a proposal by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that could force the company to sell its popular Chrome browser, warning it would harm both consumers and businesses. The DOJ is expected to present this proposal to a judge on Wednesday, according to Bloomberg.
This latest development follows a ruling in August by Judge Amit Mehta, who concluded that Google holds a monopoly in online search. Since then, the court has been considering what actions or penalties to impose. While the DOJ has not yet commented publicly on the matter, Google has made it clear that it opposes the measure.
“The DOJ continues to push a radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s executive. The company has also expressed concerns that the proposal could extend beyond Chrome, with reports suggesting that Google could be asked to implement new measures around its artificial intelligence (AI), Android operating system, and data usage.
Google argues that the government’s intervention would have a detrimental effect on the technology sector. “The government putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at precisely the moment it is most needed,” Mulholland added.
Dominance in Browsers and Search
Chrome remains the world’s most widely used web browser, with market tracker Similarweb estimating its global market share at 64.61% in October. In addition, Google Search commands nearly 90% of the global search engine market, according to Statcounter. Chrome’s prominence is also tied to its integration with Google Search, which is the default engine on Chrome and many smartphone browsers, including Safari on iPhones.
Judge Mehta had previously noted that Google’s position as the default search engine in Chrome is “extremely valuable real estate.” He observed that while new competitors could theoretically bid for this default position, they would need to invest billions of dollars to compete effectively.
Break-up Concerns
The DOJ had initially considered remedies that could involve breaking up Google’s business or forcing the company to separate key services like Chrome, Android, and its app store, Google Play. These actions are intended to prevent Google from using its products to promote its search engine and related services. In its filing, the DOJ hinted at the possibility of breaking up Google to reduce its competitive advantage in the market.
Google, however, has rejected the idea of splitting off parts of its business, arguing that it would disrupt its business models, increase the cost of devices, and undermine its ability to compete with Apple’s iPhone and App Store. The company also warned that breaking up Chrome and Android would make it more difficult to keep these services secure.
Impact on Google’s Financials
Despite these regulatory challenges, Google’s financial performance remains strong. In its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company announced a 10% increase in revenues, reaching $65.9 billion, driven by its search and advertising businesses. CEO Sundar Pichai also highlighted the growing use of Google’s AI-driven search tools, which are now accessed by millions of users worldwide.
Investors are closely watching Google’s stock performance as the DOJ’s proposed remedies move forward, with many speculating that these regulatory actions could impact the company’s future growth.
News
Prime Minister Starmer to Attend EU Security Summit Amid Tensions and Uncertainty
In early 2025, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will attend an informal summit of European Union (EU) leaders, marking the first invitation extended to the UK since the tense Brexit negotiations. The summit, scheduled for February, will focus on future security and defense cooperation, reflecting Europe’s growing concerns over the volatile global landscape.
The meeting’s backdrop is a world embroiled in conflict, with ongoing wars in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Russia, with backing from Iran, North Korea, and China, continues its aggressive actions against Ukraine, while the potential re-election of Donald Trump in the United States raises new anxieties. Trump’s threats to impose punitive tariffs on imports and his suggestion of withdrawing from NATO—a cornerstone of Western security—have heightened concerns in both the EU and the UK. These global uncertainties have underscored the importance of EU-UK collaboration in preserving security and trade stability.
For the EU, the loss of the UK after Brexit was a blow, stripping the bloc of a significant economy and its only major military power aside from France. The UK, meanwhile, while no longer bound by EU regulations, finds itself with reduced influence on the world stage. However, under Labour’s leadership, the UK has acknowledged the importance of a strong relationship with Europe, especially in addressing key domestic priorities such as the economy, defense, and migration.
Mark Leonard, director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, emphasized that Europe remains central to the Labour government’s success. “The economy, defence, migration… there’s a European element to all of this,” he said. “Things which will make a success of this government are tied up with Europe.”
Labour has repeatedly pledged an “ambitious reset” in EU-UK relations, and there has been notable diplomatic activity since their election victory. Foreign Secretary David Lammy attended an EU Foreign Ministers’ meeting, Chancellor Rachel Reeves spoke at an EU finance ministers’ summit, and Starmer himself met with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels.
Despite this goodwill, skepticism persists in Brussels. While EU figures express a desire for closer UK relations, they remain uncertain about the UK’s position on key issues. One anonymous EU diplomat noted, “The headspace is there. The appetite is there in Europe for closer UK relations. What’s less clear is what London is really interested in—and what trade-offs it’s willing to make to get there.”
As the UK and the EU prepare for a summit in the spring, the future of their relationship will depend on the UK’s willingness to engage in meaningful compromise, particularly on issues like trade and migration. With tensions still high, the outcome of the 2025 summit will be a pivotal moment in reshaping EU-UK ties.
News
Deadliest Plane Crash in South Korean History Claims 179 Lives
News
India Mourns Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh at State Funeral
-
Travel9 months ago
Embracing Solo Travel to Unlock Opportunities for Adventure and Growth
-
Politics9 months ago
Six Best Things Done by Donald Trump as President
-
Education9 months ago
Exlplore the Top Universities in the United States for Computer Science Education?
-
Technology9 months ago
Revolutionizing Healthcare Training with Latest Technologies
-
Health9 months ago
Rise of Liposuction: A Minimally Invasive Solution for Body Contouring
-
Business9 months ago
Thriving Startup Hubs: Best Cities in the USA for Entrepreneurship
-
Travel9 months ago
Where to Move? America’s Top Ten Most Affordable Cities
-
Health9 months ago
Digestive Power of taking Mint Tea after Meals