Connect with us

Published

on

Khartoum, Sudan – Russia’s embassy in Sudan is investigating reports that a cargo plane with a Russian crew was shot down in Darfur, where intense fighting continues between Sudan’s military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The plane, identified as a Russian-made Ilyushin Il-76, was reportedly delivering equipment and medicine to the army-held city of El-Fasher, according to military sources cited by Sudanese media.

On Monday, the RSF claimed responsibility for downing a Russian-made plane, initially identified as an Antonov, accusing it of being flown by the Egyptian military and targeting civilians. Egypt, however, denies allegations of providing military support to Sudan’s army during the ongoing 18-month conflict.

The civil war between Sudan’s military and the RSF erupted in April 2023, triggering what the United Nations has described as one of the world’s most severe humanitarian crises. The conflict has resulted in an estimated 150,000 deaths and displaced over 10 million people, according to the UN and reports from international observers.

Conflicting Reports on the Downed Aircraft

Details surrounding the downed aircraft remain unclear. The Russian embassy in Khartoum confirmed it is working with Sudan’s military-led government to gather more information about the incident. Reports from the Sudan Tribune suggest that all crew members, including three Sudanese nationals and two Russians, were killed in the crash near the Malha area, close to the border with Chad. However, this information has yet to be independently verified.

El-Fasher, a key stronghold for the Sudanese army in western Darfur, has been under sustained attack from the RSF since April. The RSF claims to have retrieved the plane’s black box and seized documents related to the plane and its mission.

Footage circulating online, allegedly from the crash site, shows RSF soldiers with identification documents next to the wreckage. Among the items were a Russian passport, a job identification card from Manas Airport in Kyrgyzstan, and two South African driver’s licenses linked to a single individual. Preliminary analysis suggests the individual may have been a Russian military academy graduate residing in South Africa.

One video, purportedly from the crash scene, shows an RSF fighter holding a 50-rouble Russian note, though the authenticity of the footage remains uncertain.

Ongoing Conflict and Escalating Violence

Reports are conflicting as to the cause of the crash. Some suggest a technical fault, while both the Sudanese military and the RSF claim the plane was shot down. There are also indications that the aircraft may have been mistakenly targeted due to its alleged affiliation with an airline previously linked to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The UAE denies any involvement in arming the RSF, although the United Nations has cited credible evidence suggesting otherwise.

The downing of the plane comes as fighting intensifies in Sudan, particularly around the capital, Khartoum. The RSF controls much of the city, while the military has stepped up airstrikes. In the RSF-held city of Wad Madani, over 50 people have been killed since Sunday, with local activists accusing the military of using banned barrel bombs in civilian areas.

Efforts to negotiate a ceasefire between the rival forces have so far failed, leaving Sudan’s humanitarian crisis unresolved and the violence escalating.

News

Ford to Cut 4,000 Jobs in Europe Amid Economic and EV Sales Struggles

Published

on

By

Ford has announced plans to cut 4,000 jobs across Europe by the end of 2027, attributing the decision to increased competition, weaker-than-expected electric vehicle (EV) sales, and ongoing economic challenges. The cuts, which represent around 14% of the company’s European workforce, will predominantly affect Germany, where 3,000 positions will be eliminated, along with 800 jobs in the UK.

The company emphasized that the job reductions are part of a broader strategy to improve its competitiveness in the face of a rapidly changing automotive landscape. Discussions with unions are still ongoing, and a final decision on the cuts will be made once talks are concluded.

In addition to job cuts, Ford also plans to reduce working hours for employees at its Cologne plant in Germany, where it manufactures electric vehicles such as the Capri and Explorer. Dave Johnston, Ford’s European vice president for transformation and partnerships, explained, “It is critical to take difficult but decisive action to ensure Ford’s future competitiveness in Europe.”

The company cited the global auto industry’s ongoing transition to electrified mobility as a major factor in the restructuring. Ford’s statement acknowledged the particularly challenging environment in Europe, where automakers face stiff competition, economic headwinds, and a mismatch between stringent CO2 regulations and consumer demand for electric vehicles.

To adapt to these pressures, Ford has already cut back on vehicle production, focusing on models that generate the highest profit margins. The company is also adjusting to the new regulatory landscape, where European car manufacturers must sell more electric vehicles to meet stricter carbon dioxide emission limits by 2025. However, consumer interest in EVs has been slower than anticipated, partly due to rising costs and the withdrawal of government incentives for EV purchases in key markets like Germany.

Ford’s move follows similar actions by other automakers. General Motors recently announced 1,000 global job cuts, and Nissan revealed plans to eliminate 9,000 jobs and reduce its global production capacity by 20%. Volkswagen is also reportedly considering the closure of three plants in Germany, which could result in thousands of job losses.

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association has called for a faster review of the lower CO2 emission limits set for 2026, urging policymakers to reconsider the current pace of the transition to electric vehicles amid market challenges.

Continue Reading

News

Ukraine Fires US-Supplied Long-Range Missiles Into Russia for the First Time

Published

on

By

Russia has reported that Ukraine launched U.S.-supplied long-range missiles into its territory on Tuesday, a day after Washington gave its approval for such attacks. According to Russia’s Ministry of Defence, the missiles targeted the Bryansk region in western Russia, marking the first use of the Army Tactical Missile System (Atacms) against Russian territory.

The Russian military claimed that five of the missiles were intercepted by air defence systems, while one missile was reportedly damaged. The fragments of the damaged missile allegedly caused a fire at a military facility in the region, although no further details about casualties or the extent of the damage were immediately available.

This missile strike follows a recent decision by the U.S. government to allow Ukraine to use the advanced Atacms system to target Russian positions within internationally-recognized Russian borders. Prior to this approval, the U.S. had restricted the use of such missiles to areas within the Ukrainian territory occupied by Russian forces, citing concerns over escalating the conflict.

Russia quickly condemned the missile strike and vowed to “react accordingly.” The Kremlin has previously warned that any escalation of the war, especially involving attacks on Russian territory, would lead to a strengthened military response.

The deployment of Atacms marks a significant development in the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, as the missile system has a range of up to 300 kilometers, giving Ukraine the ability to strike deeper into Russian-held territories.

Washington’s decision to allow the use of these missiles is seen as a key step in increasing military support for Ukraine, as it continues its efforts to defend its sovereignty against Russia’s ongoing invasion. However, the move has raised concerns about further intensifying the conflict and potentially drawing in more direct involvement from NATO members.

The Ukrainian government has yet to officially comment on the strike, but the use of such advanced weaponry is expected to have a significant impact on the trajectory of the war. As the conflict enters its second year, both sides continue to engage in intense military operations, with international diplomacy struggling to find a path to peace.

Continue Reading

News

Google Opposes DOJ’s Proposal to Sell Chrome, Warns of Harm to Consumers

Published

on

By

Google has strongly opposed a proposal by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that could force the company to sell its popular Chrome browser, warning it would harm both consumers and businesses. The DOJ is expected to present this proposal to a judge on Wednesday, according to Bloomberg.

This latest development follows a ruling in August by Judge Amit Mehta, who concluded that Google holds a monopoly in online search. Since then, the court has been considering what actions or penalties to impose. While the DOJ has not yet commented publicly on the matter, Google has made it clear that it opposes the measure.

“The DOJ continues to push a radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s executive. The company has also expressed concerns that the proposal could extend beyond Chrome, with reports suggesting that Google could be asked to implement new measures around its artificial intelligence (AI), Android operating system, and data usage.

Google argues that the government’s intervention would have a detrimental effect on the technology sector. “The government putting its thumb on the scale in these ways would harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at precisely the moment it is most needed,” Mulholland added.

Dominance in Browsers and Search

Chrome remains the world’s most widely used web browser, with market tracker Similarweb estimating its global market share at 64.61% in October. In addition, Google Search commands nearly 90% of the global search engine market, according to Statcounter. Chrome’s prominence is also tied to its integration with Google Search, which is the default engine on Chrome and many smartphone browsers, including Safari on iPhones.

Judge Mehta had previously noted that Google’s position as the default search engine in Chrome is “extremely valuable real estate.” He observed that while new competitors could theoretically bid for this default position, they would need to invest billions of dollars to compete effectively.

Break-up Concerns

The DOJ had initially considered remedies that could involve breaking up Google’s business or forcing the company to separate key services like Chrome, Android, and its app store, Google Play. These actions are intended to prevent Google from using its products to promote its search engine and related services. In its filing, the DOJ hinted at the possibility of breaking up Google to reduce its competitive advantage in the market.

Google, however, has rejected the idea of splitting off parts of its business, arguing that it would disrupt its business models, increase the cost of devices, and undermine its ability to compete with Apple’s iPhone and App Store. The company also warned that breaking up Chrome and Android would make it more difficult to keep these services secure.

Impact on Google’s Financials

Despite these regulatory challenges, Google’s financial performance remains strong. In its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company announced a 10% increase in revenues, reaching $65.9 billion, driven by its search and advertising businesses. CEO Sundar Pichai also highlighted the growing use of Google’s AI-driven search tools, which are now accessed by millions of users worldwide.

Investors are closely watching Google’s stock performance as the DOJ’s proposed remedies move forward, with many speculating that these regulatory actions could impact the company’s future growth.

Continue Reading

Trending