Connect with us

Published

on

The Guardian, one of the UK’s leading newspaper groups, has announced it will cease posting on X, formerly known as Twitter, due to what it described as the platform’s increasingly “toxic” nature. In a statement to its readers, the publication expressed growing concerns over the direction of the platform under the ownership of Elon Musk, particularly in light of the recent US presidential election.

The Guardian’s decision reflects its apprehension that Musk has used X to influence political discourse, with the media group pointing to his outspoken support for former President Donald Trump. Musk, who is known for his political involvement, has recently been given a role in Trump’s incoming administration to help cut government spending. The Guardian stated that it had been “considering for a while” the negative effects of being on the platform, citing issues such as the promotion of far-right conspiracy theories and racism.

While the newspaper confirmed it would no longer post directly on X, it clarified that readers could still share its articles on the platform. Additionally, The Guardian is likely to continue embedding X posts in its coverage of major world events. Despite this, the publication concluded that the “benefits of being on X are now outweighed by the negatives.”

The announcement was also shared on X itself, where reactions from users were mixed. Some responses, particularly from those who paid for prominent replies, criticized The Guardian’s decision, accusing the newspaper of promoting “woke propaganda” and “virtue signaling.”

The departure marks a sharp critique of the platform’s increasing political alignment with Trump, a figure The Guardian has long opposed. The timing of the decision, following Trump’s election victory, appears strategic, with the publication positioning itself as a key part of the opposition to Trump’s influence. The Guardian, which prides itself on being “the world’s leading liberal voice,” has used the election results to emphasize its independence from billionaire media moguls like Musk.

In a surprising turn, The Guardian’s readers responded enthusiastically to a fundraising appeal, pledging more than $1.8 million (£1.4 million) in a single day, setting a record for the newspaper. Ben Mullin, media reporter for The New York Times, noted that this surge in donations reflects growing public support for adversarial journalism in the post-election climate.

The move away from X by The Guardian could signal a wider shift in media behavior. X’s competitors, particularly Meta’s Threads and Jack Dorsey’s Bluesky, are seeing increasing user engagement. In the past two months, Bluesky gained four million new users and briefly topped the download charts in both the UK and US Apple App Stores, although it remains a smaller player with just 15 million users globally.

As X faces mounting criticism, industry experts are questioning whether more major outlets will follow The Guardian’s lead.

News

Ten Dead, 35 Injured After Attack on Bourbon Street in New Orleans

Published

on

By

A man intentionally drove his pickup truck into a crowd on Bourbon Street early Sunday morning, killing at least ten people and injuring 35 others, according to New Orleans police. The attacker then opened fire, injuring two police officers. The incident, which took place around 03:15 local time (08:15 GMT), has left the city in shock.

Police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick described the attack as deliberate, saying the assailant drove “very fast” along Bourbon Street, aiming to “run as many people as he could” before crashing through barriers. “The man was hell-bent on creating the carnage and damage that he did,” she stated. Authorities have not released details on the attacker’s condition or identity.

Witnesses described scenes of chaos as the attack unfolded. One witness, who was in the area at the time, told the BBC that they “walked past dead and injured bodies all over the street” in the aftermath. A reporter from CBS saw several injured people lying on the ground at the intersection of Bourbon and Canal streets. A video verified by BBC showed people scrambling as gunshots were heard, with one person lying motionless on the ground.

Whit Davis, a visitor from Shreveport, Louisiana, recalled being in a bar nearby when the attack began. He said that while he didn’t hear the crash or the gunshots due to loud music, panic spread quickly as people “started running and getting under tables like it was an active shooter drill.” Davis was later shocked to witness the aftermath when police allowed him to leave the bar.

In a separate account, Jim and Nicole Mowrer, visiting from Iowa, described seeing a white truck crash through a barricade at high speed, followed by gunfire. They attempted to assist the wounded but realized that the victims had already died. The Mowrers noted that the victims appeared to have been struck by the truck, not shot.

The FBI is leading the investigation, with Special Agent Althea Duncan confirming that an improvised explosive device (IED) was found at the scene. Authorities are working to determine if the device was viable.

Initial reports indicate that most of the victims were local residents. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry expressed his sorrow, saying he was “praying for all the victims and first responders on scene.” He called the act of violence “horrific” in a social media post.

The investigation into the attack is ongoing, with authorities working to understand the motive behind the incident.

Continue Reading

News

Chinese Hackers Breach US Treasury Department Systems, Access Unclassified Documents

Published

on

By

Chinese state-sponsored hackers infiltrated the US Treasury Department’s systems earlier this month, gaining access to employee workstations and some unclassified documents, US officials confirmed on Monday. The breach, described by the Treasury Department as a “major incident,” has prompted an ongoing investigation by the FBI and other agencies.

In a letter to lawmakers, the Treasury Department explained that the hackers, believed to be based in China, bypassed security systems through a vulnerability in a third-party service provider’s application. The compromised service, BeyondTrust, offers remote technical support to Treasury employees. While the third-party service has been taken offline, the department emphasized that no further unauthorized access has been detected.

The breach was first identified by BeyondTrust on December 8, although suspicious activity had been flagged as early as December 2. It took several days for the company to confirm that it had been hacked. The hackers reportedly used the service to remotely access several Treasury user workstations, obtaining some unclassified documents, but there were no indications of an attempt to steal funds.

The Treasury Department is working closely with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and third-party forensic investigators to assess the full impact of the breach. Initial reports suggest that the intrusion was likely carried out by a “China-based Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actor,” a group of hackers associated with espionage activities.

“This intrusion is being treated as a major cybersecurity incident, in accordance with Treasury policy,” said Treasury Department officials. They added that investigations are still underway to determine the scope of the compromise, including the specific nature of the files accessed and whether any additional accounts or passwords were created or altered by the attackers.

China has strongly denied the allegations, with foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning labeling the claims “baseless.” She reiterated China’s stance against hacking and rejected what she described as “false information” aimed at targeting China for political purposes. The Chinese embassy in Washington DC also dismissed the accusations as part of a “smear attack,” urging the US to stop spreading disinformation about Chinese hacking threats.

The breach follows a series of high-profile cyberattacks attributed to Chinese espionage, including a December hack that potentially compromised sensitive telecom data in the US. The Treasury Department has pledged to continue strengthening its cybersecurity measures and will provide a supplemental report on the incident to lawmakers within 30 days.

Continue Reading

News

NASA Probe Breaks Records, Sparking Debate on the Future of Space Exploration

Published

on

By

On Christmas Eve, NASA’s Parker Solar Probe made history as it soared closer to the Sun than any human-made object before, reaching temperatures of 1,000°C during its 10-day flyby. The autonomous spacecraft, pre-programmed to operate independently, collected critical data about the Sun’s atmosphere and its influence on space weather—a landmark achievement in robotic exploration.

For over six decades, robotic probes have ventured where humans cannot, from the outer planets to distant comets. The Parker Solar Probe’s success underscores the growing capabilities of robotic missions, prompting questions about the role of human astronauts in future space exploration.

“Robots are advancing rapidly, and the case for sending humans becomes weaker over time,” said Lord Martin Rees, the UK’s Astronomer Royal. He advocates for private funding for manned space missions, arguing that taxpayer money should not be used given the inherent risks and high costs.

Robotics expert Andrew Coates from University College London agrees, emphasizing that robots are more cost-effective and capable of reaching inhospitable destinations. “With the progression of artificial intelligence, robotic systems can perform increasingly complex tasks,” Coates said.

Robotic spacecraft have visited every planet in the solar system, yet humans have ventured only to Earth’s orbit and the Moon. Approximately 700 people have flown into space since 1961, primarily for orbital missions or brief suborbital flights.

Despite this, many argue that humans bring unique value to space exploration. “Humans are versatile and accomplish tasks faster than robots, but they are expensive to sustain in space,” said Dr. Kelly Weinersmith, a biologist and author.

On the other hand, robotic systems are evolving to complement human missions. NASA’s humanoid robots, such as Valkyrie and Robonaut, can perform maintenance tasks in space, enhancing safety for human astronauts. Meanwhile, autonomous rovers like NASA’s Curiosity explore Mars, using AI to make decisions and conduct experiments.

Dr. Ian Crawford, a planetary scientist, highlighted the potential of AI to improve robotic efficiency but remained skeptical about its ability to match human adaptability in exploration. “AI can beat humans at chess, but exploring new environments is a different challenge,” he said.

While robotic missions inspire public fascination, many believe human milestones, like landing on Mars, would surpass even the Moon landing in cultural impact. Retired astronaut Leroy Chiao remarked, “Humans doing extraordinary things resonate more deeply with the public.”

With NASA’s Artemis program aiming to return humans to the Moon by 2027 and SpaceX envisioning a Mars colony, the future of exploration may blend human ambition with robotic innovation. As Lord Rees speculates, advancements in genetic engineering and cyborg technology may one day redefine what it means to be a space explorer.

Continue Reading

Trending