Connect with us

Published

on

Indian full-service carrier Vistara will operate its final flight on Monday, marking the end of its nine-year run in the skies. A joint venture between Singapore Airlines and Tata Sons, Vistara is set to merge with Tata-owned Air India, forming a single airline entity that will combine their networks and fleets.

The merger will see all Vistara operations, including helpdesk kiosks and ticketing offices, transferred to Air India. The transition process, including migrating Vistara passengers and their loyalty programmes to Air India, has been underway for several months. According to an Air India spokesperson, meals, service ware, and other aspects of the passenger experience have been upgraded to reflect a blend of both airlines’ offerings.

While Vistara has been praised for its high ratings in food, service, and cabin quality, the decision to retire the brand has drawn criticism from fans, branding experts, and aviation analysts. Vistara’s loyal customer base, known for its appreciation of the airline’s premium in-flight experience, faces uncertainty about whether Air India can maintain these standards.

The consolidation, aviation analysts argue, is primarily driven by the need to address Vistara’s financial losses. Mark Martin, an aviation analyst, suggested that Air India is “being suckered into taking a loss-making airline” and that mergers should strengthen airlines, not merely eliminate losses. However, both Air India and Vistara have seen improvements in their operating metrics, with annual losses reduced by more than half.

Despite these improvements, the merger has been far from smooth. Challenges have arisen, such as pilot shortages leading to flight cancellations and mass sick leave taken by Vistara crew members over salary structure alignments. Complaints about service quality on Air India, including viral videos of malfunctioning seats and entertainment systems, have further compounded concerns.

To address these issues, Tata has announced a $400 million programme to upgrade Air India’s aircraft interiors and has placed orders for hundreds of new planes. However, analysts believe the ongoing “turnaround” is still incomplete, and the merger may complicate the situation.

From a branding perspective, the merger has also raised concerns. Harish Bijoor, a brand strategy specialist, expressed disappointment over the loss of Vistara, calling it a “gold standard for Indian aviation.” He suggested that maintaining Vistara as a distinct brand, with Air India prefixed to it, would have allowed the airline to improve its service standards before absorbing Vistara’s superior offering.

Operational challenges are expected as well, particularly in communication and cultural integration. Passengers may arrive expecting Vistara flights, only to find Air India branding. Moreover, Vistara’s agile workforce may struggle to adjust to Air India’s more bureaucratic systems.

Despite these hurdles, many industry observers agree that the merger was inevitable. With two loss-making carriers under the Tata umbrella, consolidating operations makes financial sense. The combined strength of Air India and Vistara is seen as a better positioning to compete with market leader IndiGo, particularly with Air India’s expanded fleet and workforce.

Ultimately, while the demise of Vistara leaves a void in India’s premium airline market, the future remains uncertain as Air India works to fill that gap. For now, many Vistara loyalists will be watching closely to see if Air India can successfully elevate its service to meet the high standards Vistara once set.

Business

Biden Blocks $14.9 Billion US Steel Takeover by Nippon Steel, Sparking Controversy

Published

on

By

US President Joe Biden has blocked the proposed $14.9 billion acquisition of US Steel by Japan’s Nippon Steel, citing national security concerns and fulfilling a campaign promise to protect American industries. The decision has raised tensions with Japan and sparked fears about its impact on future foreign investments in the US.

Biden explained that foreign ownership of US Steel posed risks to national security, emphasizing that maintaining a strong, domestically-owned steel industry is essential for national defense and infrastructure. “Steel powers our country: our infrastructure, our auto industry, and our defense industrial base,” Biden said in a statement. He also stated that the transaction would undermine the resilience of US supply chains, particularly in critical sectors.

The move follows pressure from the United Steelworkers union, which had expressed concerns over the potential loss of jobs and the long-term viability of the steel industry. The union hailed Biden’s decision as “the right move for our members and our national security.”

Nippon Steel and US Steel, however, strongly condemned the decision, claiming that the review process had been manipulated for political purposes. The two companies stated they would take “appropriate action to protect their legal rights,” signaling the possibility of a legal challenge. They also argued that the merger would have strengthened the US steel industry, improved competitiveness, and safeguarded American jobs.

Japanese officials reacted swiftly, with Yoji Muto, Japan’s industry and trade minister, expressing disappointment over Biden’s decision. Muto warned that it could harm future investment between Japan and the US, adding that the Japanese government would take the matter seriously. The decision has also raised concerns within the business communities of both nations.

The proposed merger, announced in December 2023, had been closely watched by both governments. Nippon Steel, the world’s fourth-largest steelmaker, had aimed to expand its presence in the US by acquiring US Steel, a company with a storied history in American industry. US Steel had warned that without the merger, it might be forced to close factories, affecting workers and local communities, particularly in Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state in the upcoming 2024 election.

Despite the companies’ efforts to allay concerns, including pledges to protect jobs and fund workforce training programs, Biden stood firm in his opposition. The decision has drawn criticism from various quarters, including conservatives and business groups, some of whom argue that it could deter foreign investments in the US.

White House spokesperson John Kirby defended the move, clarifying that it was not aimed at Japan but at preserving US steel-making capabilities. Analysts speculate that Nippon Steel and US Steel may attempt to renegotiate the deal under a future administration, potentially with more favorable terms.

The fallout from the decision could have lasting effects on US-Japan relations, with some questioning the impact on bilateral ties and future economic cooperation.

Continue Reading

Business

Apple Agrees to $95 Million Settlement Over Allegations of Eavesdropping Through Siri

Published

on

By

Apple has agreed to pay $95 million to settle a lawsuit accusing the tech giant of secretly listening to users through its virtual assistant, Siri. The settlement, which was reached in a preliminary agreement, comes after claims that Apple eavesdropped on users’ conversations and shared voice recordings with advertisers.

The lawsuit alleges that Siri was activated without users’ consent, even when the wake phrase “Hey, Siri” was not used. The claimants also argue that Apple’s failure to delete these recordings led to them being shared with advertisers, who used the data to target users with personalized ads.

Although Apple has not admitted to any wrongdoing, the company has stated in court filings that it denies the allegations that it recorded or disclosed conversations without consent. Additionally, Apple claims it permanently deleted individual Siri audio recordings collected prior to October 2019.

The lead plaintiff in the case, Fumiko Lopez, alleges that both she and her daughter were recorded without their permission. They claim that after discussing products like Air Jordans, they began seeing targeted ads for those products.

The lawsuit is classified as a class action, meaning it is brought forward by a small group of individuals on behalf of a larger group of affected users. In this case, eligible US-based claimants could receive up to $20 per Siri-enabled device they owned between 2014 and 2019. Lawyers representing the claimants are expected to receive 30% of the settlement fee, amounting to nearly $30 million.

Apple’s decision to settle, despite denying any liability, allows the company to avoid the risks of a lengthy trial that could result in a higher payout. The settlement amount, while substantial, is less than the potential cost of a trial verdict, especially as Apple has continued to see strong financial performance. The company reported $94.9 billion in revenue for the three months ending September 2024.

This settlement adds to a growing list of class action lawsuits Apple has faced in recent years. In January 2024, Apple began paying out in a $500 million lawsuit over allegations of deliberately slowing down older iPhones. Earlier in March, it agreed to pay $490 million in a class action over its App Store practices in the UK. The company is also facing a class action from the consumer group Which?, accusing Apple of overcharging customers for its iCloud service.

The same law firm representing the claimants in the Siri case is also suing Google for similar allegations of eavesdropping through Google devices, with that case ongoing in the same California court.

Continue Reading

Business

Euro Hits Two-Year Low Against US Dollar Amid Economic Concerns

Published

on

By

The euro weakened further against the US dollar, reaching a fresh low not seen in over two years, as concerns grow over the Eurozone’s economic outlook, political instability, and monetary policy divergence between the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Federal Reserve (Fed).

On Thursday, the euro fell 0.9% against the US dollar, reaching 1.02, its lowest level since November 21, 2022. This decline continues the currency’s downward trajectory into the new year, fueled by fears over economic stagnation in the Eurozone and the policy rift between the ECB and the Fed.

The EUR/USD pair has plunged from a high of above 1.12 in September 2024, marking a 9% drop over the past three months. The US dollar has gained strength, aided by a more hawkish Federal Reserve and growing political uncertainty under the presidency of Donald Trump, whose policies have increased market volatility.

Analysts predict that the euro could soon reach parity with the dollar in 2025, a level last seen during the height of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This outlook is further clouded by escalating geopolitical risks and the economic impact of the war in Ukraine. On Wednesday, Ukraine halted Russian gas transit to Europe after a five-year contract expired, forcing European countries to turn to more expensive heating alternatives during a particularly harsh winter. Natural gas futures surged to a two-year high earlier this week before retreating to $3.66 per million British thermal units (MMBtu).

Adding to the Eurozone’s economic woes, weak manufacturing data has highlighted the region’s ongoing struggles. S&P Global’s December PMI showed continued contraction in both France and Germany’s manufacturing sectors. France recorded its sharpest decline in manufacturing activity since May 2020, while Germany saw its manufacturing output hit a three-month low. France’s central bank has also downgraded its economic growth forecast for 2025, now predicting just 0.9% growth, down from an earlier forecast of 1.2%.

Political instability is also adding to the uncertainty. Both France and Germany are facing internal political challenges, including the collapse of ruling coalitions and the rise of far-right movements. This instability is compounded by the potential impact of Trump’s tariffs on European imports. Although no tariffs have been announced yet, European automakers are particularly vulnerable to possible trade restrictions.

The US dollar has surged recently, propelled by the Fed’s hawkish shift. The dollar index hit a high of 109 on Thursday, the highest level since November 2022. The Fed, after initiating an easing cycle in September with a 50 basis point rate cut, is now signaling a more aggressive stance in response to resilient economic data, including strong jobs growth.

In contrast, the ECB is expected to continue easing its policy in 2025, with analysts forecasting another rate cut next year as the Eurozone grapples with ongoing economic and political challenges. These factors contribute to a bleak outlook for the Eurozone, with the region’s economy under pressure from both internal and external forces.

Continue Reading

Trending