Connect with us

Published

on

Qatar has announced the suspension of its mediation efforts in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, following growing frustration over a lack of progress on a ceasefire deal and hostage release negotiations. A diplomatic source confirmed that both Israel and Hamas, along with the United States, were informed of the decision. As a result, the Hamas political office in Qatar, which had been a key point of negotiation, is now deemed ineffective, the source added.

A senior Hamas official acknowledged the decision but stated that the group was not directly told to leave Qatar. The decision comes after weeks of tensions, with Hamas rejecting several proposals, including one to release hostages, which reportedly led the U.S. to press Qatar to distance itself from Hamas. A senior U.S. official told reporters that after Hamas’ repeated rejection of hostage release proposals, the group’s leaders should no longer be welcomed in the capitals of U.S. allies. The official emphasized that this message was made clear to Qatar, although it declined to comment on the matter publicly.

The diplomatic shift from Qatar comes amidst continued violence in Gaza, where Israeli airstrikes have killed at least 16 people, including women and children, Palestinian medical officials reported. An Israeli strike on a school-turned-shelter in Gaza City’s Tufah neighborhood killed six, while another attack on a tent shelter in Khan Younis claimed the lives of seven, including a child and two women. A third strike targeted a hospital in central Gaza, killing three people and injuring a journalist. Israel’s army stated that the strikes targeted militants but did not provide further details or evidence.

In a positive development, Israel confirmed the first delivery of humanitarian aid to northern Gaza in weeks. Eleven trucks carrying food, water, and medical supplies reached the region’s far north, but access to certain areas, including the refugee camp of Jabaliya, was blocked by Israeli troops. The U.N. World Food Programme, involved in the distribution, reported that some supplies were offloaded in Jabaliya instead of being delivered as planned.

The delivery of aid comes amid increasing international pressure on Israel. The U.S. has set a deadline for Israel to improve aid deliveries across Gaza or face potential consequences, including loss of U.S. weapons funding. The U.S. demands that Israel allow at least 350 trucks of humanitarian aid to enter Gaza daily. However, humanitarian conditions in the region continue to worsen, with a report from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification warning of an imminent famine in parts of northern Gaza.

As the war continues, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza deepens, with over 90% of the Palestinian population displaced, according to U.N. figures. The ongoing conflict has claimed more than 43,000 lives, with the majority being women and children, Palestinian health officials report.

News

Biden Announces Offshore Drilling Ban Ahead of Trump’s Inauguration

Published

on

By

US President Joe Biden has imposed a ban on new offshore oil and gas drilling along most of the nation’s coastline, in one of his administration’s final acts on climate policy before Donald Trump takes office. The ban applies to the entire Atlantic coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, the Pacific coast off California, Oregon, and Washington, as well as a section of the Bering Sea off Alaska.

This decision comes just weeks before Trump’s scheduled return to the White House, as part of a series of last-minute environmental actions by the Biden administration. Trump, who has long pledged to “unleash” domestic fossil fuel production to lower gas prices, has repeatedly criticized Biden’s climate policies, which he sees as detrimental to energy independence.

Announcing the ban, Biden stated, “My decision reflects what coastal communities, businesses, and beachgoers have known for a long time: that drilling off these coasts could cause irreversible damage to places we hold dear and is unnecessary to meet our nation’s energy needs. It is not worth the risks.”

In response, Trump dismissed the ban as “ridiculous” during a radio interview, asserting that he could overturn the decision immediately upon taking office. “I’ll unban it immediately,” Trump declared. The incoming president has promised to reverse many of Biden’s conservation and climate change policies.

The new offshore drilling ban is enacted under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953, which allows the president to withdraw areas from mineral leasing and drilling. However, the law does not grant presidents the authority to revoke previous bans. A 2019 court ruling stipulates that a reversal would require an act of Congress, which is now controlled by Trump’s Republican party. Additionally, areas already leased for drilling are not subject to revocation under the law.

While Trump has been a staunch advocate for expanding oil and gas exploration, he used the same law in 2020 to protect waters off Florida’s coast—a move seen as politically motivated ahead of the election. Biden’s new ban will also protect that area, but with no expiration date.

The ban covers more than 625 million acres (253 million hectares) of water and is expected to face significant opposition from the oil and gas industry. Mike Sommers, president of the American Petroleum Institute, called Biden’s decision “politically motivated” and urged Congress to reverse it.

Environmental groups, however, welcomed the move. Joseph Gordon of Oceana called it “an epic ocean victory,” praising the protection of coastal communities for future generations. Environmentalists and Democrats had advocated for the ban, citing concerns that new drilling would undermine efforts to combat climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Biden’s decision is expected to spark legal challenges, with Trump likely to pursue avenues to overturn the ban. A final ruling could be made by the Supreme Court, which currently holds a conservative majority.

The decision reflects broader global concerns about the need to reduce fossil fuel consumption, with the International Energy Agency recommending a 5% annual reduction in oil and gas demand to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C.

Continue Reading

News

Sushi Restaurateurs Pay $1.3 Million for Bluefin Tuna at Tokyo Auction

Published

on

By

Sushi restaurateurs in Tokyo have spent a record sum of 207 million yen ($1.3 million, £1 million) for a bluefin tuna, making it the second-highest price ever paid at the prestigious New Year auction held at the Toyosu Fish Market.

Onodera Group, which placed the winning bid, purchased the tuna, which weighs a hefty 276 kg (608 lbs) and is roughly the size and weight of a motorbike. The fish was caught off the coast of Aomori, located in northern Japan.

Shinji Nagao, a representative of Onodera Group, shared the group’s excitement after securing the prized catch, saying that the tuna would be served at its Michelin-starred Ginza Onodera restaurants, as well as at Nadaman restaurants across the country. “The first tuna is something meant to bring in good fortune,” Nagao said, adding that he hoped customers would enjoy the meal and “have a wonderful year.”

Onodera Group has been the top bidder in the Ichiban Tuna auction for five consecutive years, with the latest purchase setting a new high for the group. Last year, the group paid 114 million yen for the winning tuna.

The highest auction price recorded since 1999 was 333.6 million yen, which was paid in 2019 for a slightly larger tuna weighing 278 kg. This record was set by sushi restaurant owner Kiyoshi Kimura, who is known as Japan’s “Tuna King.”

Toyosu Fish Market, which opened in 1935 and claims to be the largest fish market in the world, is renowned for its early-morning tuna auctions. The auction typically attracts high-end sushi restaurateurs and fishmongers who are eager to secure top-quality tuna to serve at their restaurants.

While the bluefin tuna dominated headlines, it was not the only prized catch at the auction. Hokkaido sea urchins also fetched a record-breaking 7 million yen, highlighting the market’s diverse offerings.

The annual auction is more than just a business event; it has become a symbol of Japanese culture, particularly in the world of sushi, where the first tuna of the year is seen as a good-luck charm for the coming months.

Continue Reading

News

Fate of Two Killer Whales Uncertain as Marineland Antibes Closes

Published

on

By

The future of two killer whales at Marineland Antibes, located near Cannes on the French Riviera, remains unclear following the closure of the marine zoo on Sunday. Campaigners and the zoo’s management are in disagreement over the whales’ relocation, with the French government already blocking one proposed rehoming option.

Marineland, which houses Europe’s largest collection of marine animals, announced it would close permanently on January 5 due to new animal welfare laws. The legislation, passed in 2021, bans the use of dolphins and whales in marine zoo shows, and will come into effect next year. The zoo currently holds two killer whales: Wikie, a 23-year-old female, and her 11-year-old son, Keijo.

The zoo’s management argues that shows featuring these orcas are a major draw for visitors, accounting for 90% of the park’s attendance. Without such shows, they claim, the business would not be viable. However, efforts to find new homes for Wikie and Keijo have sparked debate.

Experts agree that releasing the whales into the wild would not be viable. Both orcas were born in captivity and lack the necessary survival skills to thrive in the ocean. Marine biologist Hanne Strager compares the scenario to “taking your dog out of the house and sending him into the woods to live freely as a wolf.” Strager, who authored The Killer Whale Journals, stresses the deep bonds these orcas have formed with their human caretakers over the years.

A controversial deal to send the orcas to a marine zoo in Japan was blocked by the French government last November. Authorities cited concerns over animal welfare standards in Japan and the potential stress caused by the 13,000 km (8,000-mile) journey.

Another option is Loro Parque in the Canary Islands, which adheres to European animal welfare standards. However, campaigners fear Wikie and Keijo would continue to be forced into performances. Loro Parque has faced scrutiny after several orca deaths in recent years, including the November death of 29-year-old Keto and three others between 2021 and 2022.

Katheryn Wise of World Animal Protection (WAP) expressed concern, stating, “It would be devastating for Wikie and Keijo to end up in another entertainment venue like Loro Parque – from one whale jail to another.” WAP advocates for the orcas’ relocation to a sanctuary, such as the Whale Sanctuary Project (WSP) in Nova Scotia, Canada. This sanctuary would offer the whales a large, enclosed bay to live out their lives in a more natural environment with human support.

While sanctuary proponents argue this could offer the orcas a better quality of life, Strager raises concerns about how they would adjust to such a drastic change. The proposed sanctuary, she notes, might feel as alien to them as the open ocean.

As Marineland closes its doors and the search for a new home for Wikie and Keijo continues, the debate over the ethics of keeping killer whales in captivity grows ever more pressing.

Continue Reading

Trending